Comparison · facts verified 2026-09-12

Orbi vs Orca

Both projects put agents in git worktrees — that is where the similarity ends. Orca, from Stably, is the category's head project: "The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders," an ADE where you run a fleet of coding agents side by side and stay in the loop. Orbi is an unattended delivery line: a GitHub Issue goes in, a reviewed PR and a tagged Release come out, and nobody operates the middle. In Orca's own terms: Orca is how you run a fleet of agents; Orbi is how you stop having to.

What Orca is

Orca is built by Stably (the stablyai organization on GitHub) and describes itself, verbatim, as:

“The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders. Run Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side-by-side — each in its own worktree, tracked in one place.”

Orca README · verified 2026-09-12

“Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.”

Orca repository “About” description, same wording on onorca.dev · verified 2026-09-12

The scale is real and worth respecting: the repository was created on 2026-03-17 and reached 66,832 stars and 4,391 forks within six months (GitHub API, measured 2026-09-12) — the fastest-growing project in this comparison set, under an MIT licence. The documented surface matches the self-description: a desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux, a mobile companion for iOS and Android, a CLI (“Agents drive Orca too — script every workflow with orca worktree create, snapshot, click, and fill”), and parallel git worktrees so several agents can work at once. The review loop is operator-centered by design: “Drop comments on any diff line and ship them back to the agent — review, edit, and commit without leaving Orca.”

Sources: Orca README (self-description, CLI, worktrees, platforms, diff annotation); GitHub API repository record (stars, forks, creation date, MIT licence) — verified/measured 2026-09-12.

A workbench you operate, or a line that delivers

The two products agree on one thing — agents isolated in git worktrees — and diverge on who does the operating. Cells we could not verify in Orca's official materials read “Not verified”, never “No”.

DimensionOrbiOrca
PositioningUnattended delivery line: GitHub Issues in, tagged Releases out“The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders” — the ADE for a fleet of parallel agents (official)
The human's placeOutside the loop: open the Issue, apply ai-ready, read the evidenceIn the middle, operating: annotate diffs, steer agents, “review, edit, and commit without leaving Orca” (official)
Task entryGitHub Issue + ai-ready labelDesktop app, mobile companion, and CLI (orca worktree create); no unattended queue documented
Opens the delivery PRYesNot verified — browsing PRs in-app is documented; an agent opening the delivery PR is not
Independent review (can edit code and rerun tests)Yes — an independent session repairs the code and reruns the suiteNot verified — the documented review is a human annotating the diff
Auto-mergeYes — merges the exact reviewed headNot verified — “merge the winner” refers to comparing parallel agent outputs, not a documented PR auto-merge
Tag / ReleaseYes — freezes the SHA, tags, publishes the ReleaseNot verified
Form factorSelf-hosted CLI + systemd on your machine; hosted Cloud pilotDesktop (macOS/Windows/Linux), mobile (iOS/Android), remote runtime; CLI
Licencefair-code (Sustainable Use License)MIT

Sources: Orca README; onorca.dev; Orbi documentation — verified 2026-09-12. “Not verified” = we found no official statement, not a statement of absence.

Delivery density, stated with care

Two repositories can both be active and still mean different things by it. These are the counts on verification day — they move daily; the shape is the point. No quality judgment is implied in either direction: the numbers describe different design goals.

Count (GitHub API, 2026-09-12)OrbiOrca
Stars / forks95 / 1066,832 / 4,391
Open issues + PRs (open issues)34 (32)5,867 (2,815)
Merged PRs in the 19 days to 2026-09-12294 merged since its first commit day (2026-08-24)Not measured — its issue tracker serves a 66.8k-person community as a product front door, so raw counts are not comparable
Releases18 GitHub Releases in the same 19 daysShips near-daily (the README says “we ship daily”)

“Busy” and “converged” are different things. A 66.8k-star project's tracker is a community commons; a delivery line's tracker is a work queue. Each number is what its design wants it to be.

Sources: GitHub API — stablyai/orca; GitHub API — orbi-build/orbi; GitHub search API for open-issue counts — measured 2026-09-12.

The licence difference is real: Orca is MIT, Orbi is fair-code

If your requirement is an OSI-defined open-source licence, Orca's MIT wins and no comparison copy should blur that. Orbi is fair-code — the Sustainable Use License: you can self-host it, inspect it, and run it on your own infrastructure, but commercial redistribution is restricted so the project can keep being maintained. For a self-hosting audience that is a genuine Orbi disadvantage on paper; we state it here rather than around it. The trade it buys is the one every fair-code project bets on: continued maintenance of the tool your delivery line depends on.

Sources: Orca README (MIT badge) and GitHub API licence record; Orbi LICENSE.md (Sustainable Use License) — verified 2026-09-12.

Which one fits the job?

This is not a ranking. The two products answer different questions, and many teams will reasonably want both.

CHOOSE ORCA IF

You want to run the fleet yourself

  • You want Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side-by-side, each in its own worktree, and you personally steer them
  • You review by annotating diffs and shipping comments back to the agent
  • You want the desktop app, mobile steering, and a CLI to script the workflows
  • An MIT licence is a hard requirement for you
Visit Orca ↗

CHOOSE ORBI IF

You want the delivery to run unattended

  • A GitHub Issue with ai-ready should become a reviewed PR — with an independent session repairing code and rerunning tests
  • You want the exact reviewed head merged and published as a tagged Release, without anyone operating the middle
  • You want BYOK, your own machine, and GitHub as the queue and the evidence ledger
  • You accept a fair-code licence in exchange for a maintained delivery line
Self-host Orbi ↗

Sources and verification dates

This page is a dated snapshot: every factual claim above was checked on 2026-09-12. Star, fork and issue counts move daily; re-read the linked sources before you bet architecture on them.

Two different jobs

Run a fleet of agents with Orca; hand the delivery line to Orbi. If the second is the job — GitHub Issues becoming reviewed PRs and tagged releases while you do something else — Orbi is free to self-host, and the keys stay yours.

Is your Issue ai-ready? The 12 factors