Comparison · facts verified 2026-09-12
Orbi vs Orca
Both projects put agents in git worktrees — that is where the similarity ends. Orca, from Stably, is the category's head project: "The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders," an ADE where you run a fleet of coding agents side by side and stay in the loop. Orbi is an unattended delivery line: a GitHub Issue goes in, a reviewed PR and a tagged Release come out, and nobody operates the middle. In Orca's own terms: Orca is how you run a fleet of agents; Orbi is how you stop having to.
THE COMPETITOR, FROM ITS OWN MATERIALS
What Orca is
Orca is built by Stably (the stablyai organization on GitHub) and describes itself, verbatim, as:
“The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders. Run Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side-by-side — each in its own worktree, tracked in one place.”
Orca README · verified 2026-09-12
“Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.”
Orca repository “About” description, same wording on onorca.dev · verified 2026-09-12
The scale is real and worth respecting: the repository was created on 2026-03-17 and reached 66,832 stars and 4,391 forks within six months (GitHub API, measured 2026-09-12) — the fastest-growing project in this comparison set, under an MIT licence. The documented surface matches the self-description: a desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux, a mobile companion for iOS and Android, a CLI (“Agents drive Orca too — script every workflow with orca worktree create, snapshot, click, and fill”), and parallel git worktrees so several agents can work at once. The review loop is operator-centered by design: “Drop comments on any diff line and ship them back to the agent — review, edit, and commit without leaving Orca.”
Sources: Orca README (self-description, CLI, worktrees, platforms, diff annotation); GitHub API repository record (stars, forks, creation date, MIT licence) — verified/measured 2026-09-12.
THE OPERATING SURFACE
A workbench you operate, or a line that delivers
The two products agree on one thing — agents isolated in git worktrees — and diverge on who does the operating. Cells we could not verify in Orca's official materials read “Not verified”, never “No”.
| Dimension | Orbi | Orca |
| Positioning | Unattended delivery line: GitHub Issues in, tagged Releases out | “The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders” — the ADE for a fleet of parallel agents (official) |
| The human's place | Outside the loop: open the Issue, apply ai-ready, read the evidence | In the middle, operating: annotate diffs, steer agents, “review, edit, and commit without leaving Orca” (official) |
| Task entry | GitHub Issue + ai-ready label | Desktop app, mobile companion, and CLI (orca worktree create); no unattended queue documented |
| Opens the delivery PR | Yes | Not verified — browsing PRs in-app is documented; an agent opening the delivery PR is not |
| Independent review (can edit code and rerun tests) | Yes — an independent session repairs the code and reruns the suite | Not verified — the documented review is a human annotating the diff |
| Auto-merge | Yes — merges the exact reviewed head | Not verified — “merge the winner” refers to comparing parallel agent outputs, not a documented PR auto-merge |
| Tag / Release | Yes — freezes the SHA, tags, publishes the Release | Not verified |
| Form factor | Self-hosted CLI + systemd on your machine; hosted Cloud pilot | Desktop (macOS/Windows/Linux), mobile (iOS/Android), remote runtime; CLI |
| Licence | fair-code (Sustainable Use License) | MIT |
Sources: Orca README; onorca.dev; Orbi documentation — verified 2026-09-12. “Not verified” = we found no official statement, not a statement of absence.
A DIMENSION YOU CAN COUNT
Delivery density, stated with care
Two repositories can both be active and still mean different things by it. These are the counts on verification day — they move daily; the shape is the point. No quality judgment is implied in either direction: the numbers describe different design goals.
| Count (GitHub API, 2026-09-12) | Orbi | Orca |
| Stars / forks | 95 / 10 | 66,832 / 4,391 |
| Open issues + PRs (open issues) | 34 (32) | 5,867 (2,815) |
| Merged PRs in the 19 days to 2026-09-12 | 294 merged since its first commit day (2026-08-24) | Not measured — its issue tracker serves a 66.8k-person community as a product front door, so raw counts are not comparable |
| Releases | 18 GitHub Releases in the same 19 days | Ships near-daily (the README says “we ship daily”) |
“Busy” and “converged” are different things. A 66.8k-star project's tracker is a community commons; a delivery line's tracker is a work queue. Each number is what its design wants it to be.
Sources: GitHub API — stablyai/orca; GitHub API — orbi-build/orbi; GitHub search API for open-issue counts — measured 2026-09-12.
STATED PLAINLY, BECAUSE IT MATTERS
The licence difference is real: Orca is MIT, Orbi is fair-code
If your requirement is an OSI-defined open-source licence, Orca's MIT wins and no comparison copy should blur that. Orbi is fair-code — the Sustainable Use License: you can self-host it, inspect it, and run it on your own infrastructure, but commercial redistribution is restricted so the project can keep being maintained. For a self-hosting audience that is a genuine Orbi disadvantage on paper; we state it here rather than around it. The trade it buys is the one every fair-code project bets on: continued maintenance of the tool your delivery line depends on.
Sources: Orca README (MIT badge) and GitHub API licence record; Orbi LICENSE.md (Sustainable Use License) — verified 2026-09-12.
AN HONEST READ
Which one fits the job?
This is not a ranking. The two products answer different questions, and many teams will reasonably want both.
CHOOSE ORCA IF
You want to run the fleet yourself
- You want Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side-by-side, each in its own worktree, and you personally steer them
- You review by annotating diffs and shipping comments back to the agent
- You want the desktop app, mobile steering, and a CLI to script the workflows
- An MIT licence is a hard requirement for you
Visit Orca ↗
CHOOSE ORBI IF
You want the delivery to run unattended
- A GitHub Issue with
ai-ready should become a reviewed PR — with an independent session repairing code and rerunning tests
- You want the exact reviewed head merged and published as a tagged Release, without anyone operating the middle
- You want BYOK, your own machine, and GitHub as the queue and the evidence ledger
- You accept a fair-code licence in exchange for a maintained delivery line
Self-host Orbi ↗
PROVENANCE
Sources and verification dates
This page is a dated snapshot: every factual claim above was checked on 2026-09-12. Star, fork and issue counts move daily; re-read the linked sources before you bet architecture on them.
-
Orca README — “The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders”, parallel worktrees, diff annotation, CLI, platforms, “we ship daily”, MIT
verified 2026-09-12
github.com/stablyai/orca
-
GitHub API — stablyai/orca — 66,832 stars, 4,391 forks, created 2026-03-17, MIT, the ADE “About” description
measured 2026-09-12
api.github.com/repos/stablyai/orca
-
onorca.dev — Orca's official site: “the agent development environment”, desktop/mobile/remote runtime
verified 2026-09-12
onorca.dev
-
GitHub API — orbi-build/orbi — Orbi-side counts: stars, open issues, 294 merged PRs and 18 Releases in the first 19 days
measured 2026-09-12
api.github.com/repos/orbi-build/orbi
-
Orbi LICENSE.md — Sustainable Use License (fair-code)
verified 2026-09-12
github.com/orbi-build/orbi
-
Orbi documentation — the Orbi column: Issue +
ai-ready, independent review, exact-head merge, tag + Release
verified 2026-09-12
docs.orbi.build
FAIR-CODE CORE
Two different jobs
Run a fleet of agents with Orca; hand the delivery line to Orbi. If the second is the job — GitHub Issues becoming reviewed PRs and tagged releases while you do something else — Orbi is free to self-host, and the keys stay yours.
Is your Issue ai-ready? The 12 factors